Realms of meaning and the Baldridge model as a framework of systems Sher L. Miller Williams and William Allan Kritsonis, PhD
Sheri L. Miller-Williams & William Allan Kritsonis, PhD
Introduction
Systems thinking is a perspective that helps view events and organizations in a new light patterns and respond to them in advanced form. As a language, systems thinking has unique qualities that help organizations to communicate about their many systems. Systems thinking emphasizes wholes rather than parts, and highlights the role of interconnections, including the role each a play in the systems at work in our lives. It also emphasizes the feedback loop rather than linear cause and effect (Pegasus Communications, 2009). In today's schools, leaders have to operate in the field of enormous complexities unknown circumstances. Today's leader must use a different form of think about their organizations and ways to handle the challenges they face.
It is insufficient and often counterproductive for leaders to act as limited proper functioning of the machine (Reed, 2006). Leaders must ensure that there is a process by which the engine works so well. Leaders provide valuable services discern when a system or process has outlived its venerable utility, or who is working as designed, but against the general purpose of the organization. Sometimes leaders forget that systems are created by people, based on an idea of what should happen at a given point in time (Reed, 2006).
The sociologist Robert K. Merton coined the term "goal displacement" to describe what happens when complying with the bureaucratic process becomes in the target instead of focusing on organizational goals and values (Reed, 2006). When there is a lack of systems, organizations tend to take a life that leads to additional dysfunction and a lack of order. Because of their experience and position, leaders are vested with the authority to intervene and correct a malfunction or leave systems. At a minimum, you can advocate for those with less positional authority can not shape change. Leaders at all levels should therefore be alert the systems that drive human behavior contrary to organizational effectiveness (Reed, 2006). Leaders therefore need to see the parties together with the set.
In his book, Organization Theory: Modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives (1997), Mary Jo Hatch, offers an introduction to systems general theory that is useful to think in organizations. She makes a point worth repeating: the language of simple machines creates blind spots when used as a metaphor of human or social systems, human systems are infinitely more complex and dynamic. In other words, can be counterproductive for the treatment of a complex system social dynamics and a simple machine (Reed, 2006).
Systems such as the human body, have parts and parts affect the performance of the whole. All parts are interdependent. Affects the liver and interacts with other internal organs, the brain, heart, kidneys, etc. You can study separately the parties, but due to the interactions, it makes little practical sense to stop there. The realization that the system can not depend on individual analysis. The key to understand, therefore, the synthesis (Reed, 2006). The systems approach requires the leader to identify a system, some of which are simple, while others are complex. Leaders must also focus on continuous whole rather than its parts. The systems thinker remains present in the global system, and analysis of results.
Systems thinking is a holistic approach to analysis that focuses on how the constituent parts of a system interrelate and how systems work over time and within the context of larger systems. Systems thinking approach contrasts with the traditional analysis, which studies systems decompose into its elements separately.
Systems thinking can be used in any field of research and has been applied to the study of medicine, environment, political, economic, human, and educational systems, among many others. According to systems thinking, the results of behavior of the system against for the purpose of reinforcing and balancing processes. A reinforcing process leading to an increase of some components of the system. If not marked by the strengthening of an equilibrium process, eventually leads to collapse. A balancing process is one that tends to maintain balance in a particular system (Pegasus Communications, 2009).
Purpose of article
The purpose of this article is to introduce the concept of systems thinking and suggest two frameworks that could work to support comprehensive school reform.
What is comprehensive School Reform?
School Reform (CSR) focuses on the reorganization and rejuvenation of the schools, as opposed the application of a number of focused, and uncoordinated, potentially, the initiatives of school improvement. schools in general, efforts have been focused on social responsibility with the greatest need of reform and improvement. Often schools are dedicated to CRS high-poverty schools with low scores on tests of students. According to recent data from the Southwest Educational Development Laboratory (SEDL), schools that receive money to implement CSR models through CARP have an average poverty rate of 70%. In addition, almost 40% of schools that receive funds CSRP identified for school improvement under Title I Regulations and 25% but were identified as low performing schools by state or local policies (SEDL, 2009). Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) 1965, which also aims to expand and improve educational opportunities in schools of high poverty in the country, has also provided a large amount of funds for CSR efforts.
The U.S. Department of Education CSR frameworks around eleven distinct components that, when applied consistently, represent an extensive "and" scientifically based "approach to school reform. Specifically, a CSR program must:
Using proven methods learning, teaching, and school management based on scientific research and effective practices that have been replicated successfully in schools;
- Integrating teaching, assessment, classroom management, professional development, parental involvement and school management;
- Provide high quality and continuous teacher and staff professional development and training;
- Include measurable goals for student academic achievement and establishes benchmarks for achieving those objectives;
- Is the support of teachers, principals, administrators and other staff members throughout the school;
- Provide support to teachers, principals, administrators and other school staff by creating shared leadership and broad base of responsibility for the efforts reform;
- Provide for the meaningful participation of parents and local community in planning, implementation and evaluating school improvement activities;
- The use of high quality external support and technical assistance from an entity that has expertise in the whole school reform and improvement, which may include an institution of higher education;
- Include a plan for the annual evaluation of the implementation of school reform and student results achieved;
- Identify federal, state, local and private financial and other deals that schools can be used to coordinate services that support and sustain the school reform effort, and
- Meet one of the following requirements: the program is found, the throughscientifically research base, to significantly improve the academic performance of students involved, or the program has been found to have strong evidence that significantly improve the academic performance of participating children. (U.S. Department of Education / General Guidance School Reform
, p.5)
Strategic Planning: Through a systems lens of postmodern thought
Strategic planning determines where an organization is going in the coming years or more and how it will to arrive. Once a leader sees the organization through a lens of systems, strategic planning will have a new meaning. Normally, the process is systems thinking throughout the organization, or focused on a role as fundamental as the division, department or function of importance. Most school board members and district administrators instinctively like the idea of strategic planning. Many districts, however, have no real understanding what is and what you need. Strategic planning focuses on the organization's resources on mutually predetermined measurable outcomes. An effective, By this definition, includes all the resources of an organization and its goals (Cook, Jr., 1988). You must be constructed deliberately and carefully (Peterson, 1989). Strategic planning allows people to influence the future. The very act of planning implies that schools are more than passive pawns in the hands of socioeconomic forces.
A strategic plan often begins with a mission statement. Most districts and schools also based on the vision statement to support the organization's management. Both the mission and vision of serving process and the pillars of the school or systemic change at the district level. The strategic plan also outlines the purpose of the district and the operations you want to achieve, and what it does. It is recommended that schools and districts involved in the strategic planning process to identify the main trends affecting the organization as a basis to begin the process of strategic planning. Thomas Hart (1988) recommends the use of several small groups to begin the planning process. Within these groups participants discuss, combine and rank their goals for the district. Representatives from each group reports the largest body that everyone shares a sense of cohesion and consensus. Once the planning group enjoys a degree of consensus, it can release its objectives to the subcommittees to formulate the objectives for each goal. Must be specified when the task must be completed and who is responsible to complete it.
Strategic plans are typically integral. In schools today, almost all managers have to lead their teams of school through the process of creation of campus improvement plans, which have become a spin-off of strategic planning. General, this includes all the essentials for a district or mission schools. Strategic planning usually includes several major activities or steps in the process. Different people often have different names for these key activities. There are several ways postmodern to conduct strategic planning: strategic analysis, setting strategic direction and action planning. The strategic analysis includes an analysis or review of the overall situation of the organization. This can include environmental factors including demographics, changes in social and economic forces, etc. Within this activity there is also an assessment of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, also known as SWOT analysis.
Other activities related to question the way in which organizations is the business plan in which the strategic direction. This activity includes the assessment of the status of the organization, including key challenges and opportunities. Since then, the organization is willing to establish strategic objectives and strategies to achieve those objectives. Within this process, targets to meet the following criteria: specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and timely. This process is also known as setting SMART goals.
Activity end in relation to strategic planning is the planning of actions. Action planning involves how the objectives will be fulfilled. This process includes specific objectives and results of organizations seeks to accomplish. By setting a goal, the method is set to define how the organization will succeed. The final stage for action planning is to establish where the responsible and timetables to measure progress against objectives. The monitoring and evaluation was also established during this activity.
Baldridge Model: Application of the Realms of Meaning to the Strategic Planning and Systems Thinking Process
Baldridge is a process of continuous improvement that has been used in business. Appointed by former Commerce Secretary Malcolm Baldridge, Baldridge criteria is a project for the development of quality business practices. In 1998, the Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Award was expanded in health care and education and education Baldridge application was developed called BIE (Baldridge in Education.). BIE Baldridge criteria incorporated in a framework in which local actors and communities take the lead in transforming their own education systems. It allows them to improve overall school effectiveness, the use of resources and capabilities. Provides a guide for managers, school boards, union leaders, businesses, teachers, parents and students to take collective responsibility for implementing their own improvement efforts. Purposes Baldridge essential include: helping to improve education practices of performance, providing bases for self-assessment and continuous feedback process improvement, facilitating communication and exchange of best practices within / between departments of state educational institutions of education, districts, schools and classrooms, promoting partnerships between sectors, and serve as a tool to improve the performance of education, planning, training and evaluation of the organization. The Baldridge model ((National Association of Elementary School Principals, 2006), is divided into seven categories:
Organization / Visionary Leadership
- Strategic objectives and actions
- Client Requirements (Student and stakeholder focus)
- Information and Analysis
- Human Resources Focus
- Process Management
- Results School / Education student-centered
The Six Realms as a fundamental framework for systems thinking and strategic planning based on the Baldridge Framework
Understanding the modes of human understanding from the six realms of meaning provides a guide to improving organizational effectiveness and provides a great opportunity to increase student achievement in schools in the country. These six patterns are described as: Symbols, empirical research, aesthetics, synnoetics, ethics and synoptic. Each realm of meaning and each of its component sub realms can be described in terms of their typical methods, the main ideas and structures characteristic (Kritsonis, 2007).
Symbolic: Language Planning
The kingdom first, the symbolic, including ordinary language, mathematics and various types of nondicursive symbolic forms such as ritual gestures, rhythmic patterns, like (Kritsonis, 2007). Managers who use the arts as a symbolic means of communicating your expectations, establishing rituals and patterns, and using the power of the tongue have the ability to move forward effectively with their campus. In recent years, directors have begun to establish leadership teams, a core group of staff working to support the program's director. The team members are the other teams within the school and in general the symbolic nature of the primary use of those around him / her works to move the school forward.
Empirical: Knowledge as a strategic approach
The second area, empirical research, including the sciences of the physical world of living beings, and man. These sciences provides descriptions of facts, generalizations, and theoretical formulations and explanations based on observation and experimentation in the world of matter, life, the mind and society (Kritsonis, 2007). Through an
understanding of empirical research, managers are able to engage stakeholders on the need to systematically change the way the school reform efforts will impact the whole school. Directors do this by focusing on the establishment systems, processes, procedures and structures that work to impact students. No matter what an individual plans are the time that the director can show a sharp focus on the best solutions for students. It is equally important for managers of arming its partners with the knowledge, tools and resources need empower change.
Aesthetic Beauty in the Strategic Planning Process Focused on learner-centered education and organizational / personal learning
Aesthetics, the third kingdom, can be defined as the branch of philosophy dealing with beauty and taste (emphasizing in the evaluation criteria that apply to art.) Aesthetics contains the various arts, such as music, visual arts, the art of movement, and literature (Kritsonis, 2007). learning-centered education is where the focus of education on learning and the real needs of students. The primary objective is student educational assets tailored to individual styles. Students are involved with self-assessment and personal progress chart. Organizational Learning and Personnel is to improve continuous approaches and processes and adaptation to change. Learning is integrated into the organization and involves all teachers and students as active contributors and participants.
Strategic planning is an art form. The directors must adopt and use the strategic planning process to provide stakeholders a roadmap for comprehensive school reform. It is only through the beauty of seeing a plan to pay off and impact the lives of students, that the power of the work becomes real for those involved. Managers who have mastered this art in general, are more successful in driving provides comprehensive school reform. This explains why some managers are able to turn-around failing schools, while others can not.
The kingdom of Synnoetics: Rate relations with the Faculty, Staff and Partners
interpersonal skills, planning skills, instructional skills of observation, and skills in evaluation research and harmonize with the fourth kingdom, synnoetics. Synnoetics includes "personal knowledge" and means "relational knowledge" it means to have sympathy or sentiment. This personal knowledge or relationship is concrete, direct, and existential (Kritsonis, 2007). Assessment of faculty, staff and partners is the practice of creating both internal and external partnerships that are focused on general learning and achieve goals. mutual investments are made for the development of knowledge, skills and motivation of teachers, staff and students.
Interpersonal or people skills are essential to the success of being a principal. These ability to maintain confidence, stimulate motivation, and empowerment to enhance collegiality. Throughout the strategic planning process, promotion of collegiality, sharing, cooperation and collaboration are essential. Planning, clearly identifying the goals or the vision to work towards, and cause the commitment and enthusiasm, and ongoing evaluation of the changes that must occur.
Ethics: The Moral Barometer or Development Organizational
The kingdom of sessions, ethics, morality includes meanings that express obligation and not a fact, the form of perception, or awareness of the relationship (Kritsonis, 2007). A list of competencies for directors recommended by a national association of the task force of Secondary School Principals "Includes problem analysis, organizational capacity, determination, effective communication skills, stress tolerance. NASSP has developed a statement of ethics for a director who recognizes its important role of professional leadership in school and community. He says: "Managers must articulate a vision and values that can used to transform or revitalize a school environment, according to the Office of Educational Research and Improvement Director Selection Guide "(1987, p. 11). Be determined, creative and enthusiastic – ready and able to address challenges and seek opportunities to inspire their school communities toward beneficial change. This growth must take place through empowerment rather than coercion, through delegation, which extends the capacity of others, promoting education and risk (Dufour and Eaker, 1987). The director should be a catalyst and advocate for school improvement.
Synoptic Gospels: Unearthing Visionary Leadership and options for all stakeholders
The kingdom sixth summary refers to the meanings that are broadly inclusive. The historical interpretation involves an artistic re-creation of the past, in obedience to the objective data, in order to reveal what the man by his own deliberate choices made himself within the context of their circumstances (Kritsonis, 2007). In order to ensure that schools can focus on systematically improve, managers must arm their groups of interest by empowering options. In regard to the artistic recreation of the past, and obedience to objective data, managers need to avoid fragmentation and conflict, and focus on ways of coherence, evaluation and improvement.
Visionary leadership is to establish and communicate instructions clear and visible, and high expectations in a student-centered environment, focusing on learning. There is a visible commitment to continuous improvement and modeling of the principles of continuous improvement and practices.
Concluding remarks
In conclusion, both ways of knowing Through the Realms of Meaning (Kritsonis, 2007) and Baldridge model provides a structured model for performance excellence. Baldrige criteria are generally used as a framework to understand, evaluate and improve their businesses or schools. Without a framework of schools continue to find comprehensive school reform difficult to achieve. Both the six realms of meaning and focus Baldridge provide a way to examine comprehensive school reform.
REFERENCES
Comprehensive reform of the school (2009). Retrieved July 4, 2009, the Southwest Educational Development Laboratory Website: http://www.sedl.org/csrd/awards.html
WJ, Jr. (1988). Bill Cook of strategic planning, chef schools U.S..
Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
Dufour, R., & R Eaker. (1987, September). The principal as leader: Two important
responsibilities. NASSP BULLETIN, 71 (500), 80-89.
Hart, TE (1997). A long-range planning: School districts prepare for the future. Eugene, OR: School of the Council of Oregon.
Hatch, MJ (1997). Organizational theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kritsonis, W. (2007). Ways of knowing through the realms of meaning. Houston, TX: National FORUM Journals.
Peterson, D. (1989). Strategic planning. Retrieved July 4, 2009, from ERIC Digest Web site: http://www.ericdigests.org/pre-9213/planning.htm
Reed, G. (2006) Leadership. And systems thinking. Retrieved on July 4, 2009, the Defense AT & L Web site: http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/dau/dau/ree_mj06.pdf.
U.S. Department of Education (nd). Whole school reform. Retrieved on July 4, 2009, the Comprehensive School Reform Program Guidance Website: TTH: / / www.ed.gov/offices/OESE/compreform/guidance2000.html
What is systems thinking? Retrieved July 4, 2009, from Pegasus Communications website: http://www.pegasuscom.com/systems-thinking.html
Above 250,000 Annual Visit our website
About 56,000 articles ar
e downloaded for academic purposes
View: www.nationalforum.com
FORUM magazines – Established in 1983
About the Author
Sheri L. Miller Williams and William Allan Kritsonis, PhD
Additional Information
